Anti-Gadaffi rebels are the Libyan wing of the Ku Klux Klan

The Libyan rebels are the darlings of our media. They are described as seeking a parliamentary style democracy in Libya. Of course I would say the same if I wanted to overthrow my government but needed help from the West to do so. If it helped me gain weapons I would even tell them I want to have McDonalds, sweatshops and access to PlayboyTV in my country.

Thus I do not consider these claims to be very reliable. But then who are the rebels, if they're not pro-democracy activists? It's very simple. They are the Libyan wing of the Ku Klux Klan. In the same manner that racism and religious extremism are a bigger problem in the Southern United States (No offense meant to my Southern readers), or in North-Western Pakistan, they're a bigger problem in Eastern Libya.

A Diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks explains how religious fundamentalism is a major problem in Eastern Libya and especially Benghazi, where the uprising of the Libyan Wing of the Ku Klux Klan began. It mentions:

Unlike the rest of the country, sermons in eastern Libyan mosques are laced with phraseology urging worshippers to support JIHAD in Iraq and elsewhere through direct participation or financial contributions. While senior regime figures, including Saif al-Islam al-Qadhafi, appear to have recognized that the east merits more attention and investment, the reported ability of radical imams to propagate messages urging support for and participation in JIHAD despite GOL security organizations' efforts suggests that claims by senior GOL officials that the east is under control may be overstated.

[...]

xxxxxxxxxxxx partly attributed the fierce mindset in Benghazi and Derna to the message preached by imams in eastern Libyan mosques, which he said is markedly more radical than that heard in other parts of the country. xxxxxxxxxxxx makes a point of frequenting mosques whenever he visits Libya as a means to connect with neighbors and relatives and take the political pulse. Sermons in eastern mosques, particularly the Friday 'khutba', are laced with "coded phrases" urging worshippers to support JIHAD in Iraq and elsewhere through direct participation or financial contributions. The language is often ambiguous enough to be plausibly denied, he said, but for devout Muslims it is clear, incendiary and unambiguously supportive of JIHAD. Direct and indirect references to "martyrdom operations" were not uncommon. By contrast with mosques in TRIPOLI and elsewhere in the country, where references to JIHAD are extremely rare, in Benghazi and Derna they are fairly frequent subjects.[Link]

The fact that the Libyan rebel army is made up of Al Qaeda is an open secret. In a previous report I looked at some of the evidence for this.[Link] Back then I was seen as insane by some for believing Gadaffi's claim that he was fighting Al Qaeda. As of speaking the evidence shows I was right. In The Telegraph we find an admission by a top NATO commander that the rebels have links to Al Qaeda:

Admiral James Stavridis, Nato's Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, said that American intelligence had picked up "flickers" of terrorist activity among the rebel groups. Senior British government figures described the comment as "very alarming".

[...]

"We are examining very closely the content, composition, the personalities, who are the leaders of these opposition forces," Admiral Stavridis said in testimony  to the US Senate.

While the opposition's leadership appeared to be "responsible men and women" fighting the Gaddafi regime, Admiral Stavridis said, "we have seen flickers in the intelligence of potential al Qaeda, Hizbollah, we've seen different things."

The Libyan Rebel commander admits his men fought with Al Qaeda in Iraq to murder American soldiers. From the Telegraph:

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited "around 25" men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are "today are on the front lines in Adjabiya".

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters "are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists," but added that the "members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader".

His revelations came even as Idriss Deby Itno, Chad's president, said al-Qaeda had managed to pillage military arsenals in the Libyan rebel zone and acquired arms, "including surface-to-air missiles, which were then smuggled into their sanctuaries".

Mr al-Hasidi admitted he had earlier fought against "the foreign invasion" in Afghanistan, before being "captured in 2002 in Peshwar, in Pakistan". He was later handed over to the US, and then held in Libya before being released in 2008.

US and British government sources said Mr al-Hasidi was a member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG, which killed dozens of Libyan troops in guerrilla attacks around Derna and Benghazi in 1995 and 1996.[Link]

This fact illustrates how the US government does not care about it's own personnel, since it now is helping the people who murdered their soldiers. American soldiers would be wise to desert the US military in protest of the people who murdered their fellow soldiers now being aided through NATO bombardments. I have mentioned in a previous report the fact that the day of rage was called on the same day as the last men from the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group would be released. The fact that this rebel commander was a member of the Islamic Fighting Group of course demonstrates that my assertions were right and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group plays a major role in this conflict.[Link]

An Algerian newspaper mentions how the rebels sold weapons to Al Qaeda:

Rebels who have plundered Libyan army depots sell weapons to militants from Al Qaeda's North Africa branch, the Algerian paper L'Expression said referring to a source from the Algerian security forces.

The militant Islamist group has already received heavy weaponry and air defense missiles from the Libyan rebels, the paper said, adding that if Western nations decide to equip the Libyans, these weapons could also come to the hands of Al Qaeda terrorists.

"Al Qaeda continues to recruit fighters on Libyan territory and is preparing a war against the regime of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi," the paper said.April 2011.[Link]

Anti-Semitism amongst the rebels

Anti-semitism is a loaded term, because it tends to be used by hate groups like the ADL against people who either criticize the terrorist political entity of Israel or people who happen to be Jewish. Nonetheless, anti-semitism, that is, a hatred of individuals simply because of their Jewish ethnic background, does exist, and it is a problem. From AOLnews we find:

To many Libyan people, the biggest question mark about Gadhafi does not involve his repressive and dictatorial rule, delusional statements or brazen lies. Behind closed doors, for years, they've wondered if he is Jewish. Last week the issue came out in the open, as NBC's Richard Engel reported from Libya that one in five rebels was fighting Gadhafi because he believes the leader is Jewish.[Link]

Now this seems like an intentional myth used to demonize Gadaffi by playing into racist sentiments amongst elements of the Libyan population, but it does demonstrate a problem for the official media account. If one in five rebels are simply fighting Gadaffi because they think the man supposedly has a Jewish mother, what kind of democracy activists are these? If one in five Obama voters voted for Obama because they believed McCain has a Jewish mother, how would the media respond to that? Can you imagine the outrage? But now, nobody appears to care. 

Worse though than anti-semitic beliefs amongst the Libyan rebels are the anti-African inclinations of the rebels. Not because either form of racism is worse, but because Libya is home to 2 million black people whose lives are at stake.

Anti-Black racism amongst the Libyan Ku Klux Klan: Pogroms, rape, murder and hatred

Black men and women need to be aware of one thing. The media are not their friends. Al Jazeera raises racist sentiments amongst Libyan people by telling them that any black man found in Libya must be a mercenary imported by Muammar al-Gadaffi. Do they think for a moment about their responsibility? The American media claim to be concerned about human rights violations in Libya, but what about Ivory coast? What about Congo?  

Unless you have oil, NATO doesn't care about you. Anyone, whether black or white, concerned about African issues should get his news from Africans themselves because our media does not care what happens to black families in Libya. They simply do not care. If it takes a genocide to get rid of Gadaffi, the media is OK with that.

In 2000 there was a racist uprising against black Libyans. Hundreds were killed by racist mobs armed with Machetes.[Link]

The reality now on the ground is that the Libyan Ku Klux Klan is raping black women and girls. The LATimes reports:

One of the accused shown to journalists was Alfusainey Kambi, 53, a disheveled Gambian wearing a bloodstained sport shirt and military fatigue trousers. He said he had been dragged from his home and beaten by three armed men who he said also raped his wife. A dirty bandage covered a wound on his forehead.[Link]

The United Nations has reported on the rape of a 12 year old girl by rebels:

 Sudanese refugees arriving from eastern Libya at the Egyptian border told UNHCR that armed Libyans were going door to door, forcing sub-Saharan Africans to leave. "In one instance a 12-year-old Sudanese girl was said to have been raped," Mr. Edwards said.[Link]

As mentioned, black families are also forced out of their homes. Going through all reported cases of abuse rape and torture black Libyans go through by the Libyan Ku Klux Klan would be a difficult task, but it has to be done. This report is not the right place for this, I will see if I can accomplish this task on Wikipedia.

Numerous black men are also lynched:

We left behind our friends from Chad. We left behind their bodies. We had 70 or 80 people from Chad working for our company. They cut them dead with pruning shears and axes, attacking them, saying you're providing troops for Gadhafi. The Sudanese, the Chadians were massacred. We saw it ourselves.(Link)

Video of all the abuse black Libyans go through is available on youtube, you can look for yourself if you feel the need to. It is usually mistitled by the Western Ku Klux Klan sympathizers as being evidence of "black mercenaries".

The looming threat for black Libyans when Gadaffi loses to the rebels is genocide. This is the final solution they have planned for the black Libyans. This is their own admission:

“Even before this, black Africans in general are not liked at all, but this [mercenary] theory has made the situation tremendously worse,” one black African man, holed up at home and too worried about reprisals to be identified by name or nationality, said by telephone from Tripoli.

Like many black Africans, he speaks of rebel sympathisers in the capital Tripoli clamouring outside his door at night, warning him he will be the first to be killed when the regime falls.[Link]

This is the future that Libya faces if Gadaffi falls.  

The West is willing to destroy Libya and carry out a genocide, all to get rid of Gadaffi. The left will cheer them on along the way. Make no mistake, it is the cowardly left that made this possible. 

BUT... LIBYANS RESPECT AND LOVE  GADDAFI

[source: http://davidrothscum.blogspot.com/2011/04/anti-gadaffi-rebels-are-libyan-wing-of.html]
read also :

Libya war: #Feb17 Anti-Gadaffi rebels are the Libyan wing of the Ku Klux Klan [libyasos] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt4dtCYCcx4

(V) Martyr blood of Varffala in Libya (+18) -->

http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/beheading-in-name-of-democracy-in-libya.html

(V) RIP HEART and play with it --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/peaceful-protesters-from-benghazi-rip.html

(V) Massacre ni Benghazi (+18) --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/v-massacre-ni-benghazi-18.html

(V) Cutting BABY's fingers, legs and hands (+18) --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/cutting-babys-fingers-legs-and-hands.html

(V) Bloody Scandal (+18) --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/bloody-scandal.html

(V) Rape in Libya --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/v-rape-in-libya.html

(V) Rebels are killers It is so simply 

--> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/visual-diary-shows-libyan-rebels.html

(V) Crime in Benghazi --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/v-crime-in-benghazi.html

(V) BRUTAL HANGING IN BENGHAZI --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/v-brutal-hanging-in-benghazi.html

(V) TARGETING BLACK PEOPLE --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/v-targeting-black-people.html

(V) BURNED SOLDIER (+18) --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/v-burned-soldier-18.html

(V) SODOMISING A DEAD SOLDIER in LIBYA +18 --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/v-18-pro-democracy-harassment-dead.html

(V) Evidence of Libya torture in Benghazi HOSPITAL  -->  http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-of-libya-torture-benghazi.html
(V) "Peaceful protesters" burnt court in Benghazi -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3besy4pbTus 

(V) IMPORTANT!PROPAGANDA ala HOLLYWOOD STYLE ( part II) --> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/propaganda-ala-hollywood-style-part-ii.html

(V) Libyan rebels (killers)  in Benghazi hanging man #Feb17- http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/07/libya-rebels-in-benghazi-binging.html

AL QAEDA and LIBYAN REVOLUTION

[original text: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/270293/al-qaeda-and-libyan-rebellion-john-rosenthal?page=1 ]

    A new report from two French think tanks concludes that jihadists have played a predominant role in the eastern-Libyan rebellion against the rule of Moammar Qaddafi, and that “true democrats” represent only a minority in the rebellion. The report, furthermore, calls into question the justifications given for Western military intervention in Libya, arguing that they are largely based on media exaggerations and “outright disinformation.” 

Al Qaeda in Libya part I

    The sponsors of the report are the Paris-based International Center for Research Study on Terrorism and Aide to Victims of Terrorism (CIRET-AVT) and the French Center for Research on Intelligence (CF2R). The organizations sent a six-member expert mission to Libya to evaluate the situation and consult with representatives on both sides of the conflict.  and

    From March 31 to April 6, the mission visited the Libyan capital of Tripoli and the region of Tripolitania; from April 19 to April 25, it visited the rebel capital of Benghazi and the surrounding Cyrenaica region in eastern Libya.

Al Qaeda in Libya part II

    The report identifies four factions among the members of the eastern Libyan National Transitional Council (NTC). Apart from a minority of “true democrats,” the other three factions comprise partisans of a restoration of the monarchy that was overthrown by Qaddafi in 1969, Islamic extremists seeking the establishment of an Islamic state, and former fixtures of the Qaddafi regime who defected to the rebels for opportunistic or other reasons.

     There is a clear overlap between the Islamists and the monarchists, inasmuch as the deposed King Idris I was himself the head of the Senussi brotherhood, which the authors describe as “an anti-Western Muslim sect that practices an austere and conservative form of Islam.” The monarchists are thus, more precisely, “monarchists-fundamentalists.”

 Abdel Hakim Al Hasidi

    The most prominent of the defectors, the president of the NTC, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, is likewise described by the authors as a “traditionalist” who is “supported by the Islamists.” The authors point out that Jalil played an important role in the “Bulgarian nurses affair,” so called for five Bulgarian nurses who, along with a Palestinian doctor, were charged with deliberately infecting hundreds of children with AIDS in a hospital in Benghazi. As chair of the Appeals Court in Tripoli, Jalil twice upheld the death penalty for the nurses. In 2007, the nurses and the Palestinian doctor were released by the Libyan government following negotiations in which French president Nicolas    Sarkozy’s then wife, Cecilia, played a highly publicized role. 

    The report describes members of the al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group as the “main pillar of the armed insurrection.” “Thus the military coalition under NATO leadership is supporting a rebellion that includes Islamic terrorists,” the authors write. 

   Alluding to the major role played by the Cyrenaica region in supplying recruits for al-Qaeda in Iraq, they add, “No one can deny that the Libyan rebels who are today supported by Washington were only yesterday jihadists killing American GIs in Iraq.”

    The full composition of the NTC has not been made public. But, according to the authors, one avowed al-Qaeda recruiter, Abdul-Hakim al-Hasadi, is himself a member of the NTC. (On al-Hasadi, see my March 25 report here.) Al-Hasadi is described by the authors as the “leader of the Libyan rebels.” Although Western media reports commonly say that he is in charge of the defense of his home town of Darnah in eastern Libya, the CIRET-CF2R report suggests that in mid-April, al-Hasadi left Cyrenaica by boat in order to participate in the battle of Misrata. He is supposed to have taken arms and 25 “well-trained fighters” with him. Misrata is in western Libya, a mere 135 miles from Tripoli.

Regarding the effects of western military intervention in support of the rebels, the authors conclude:

Western intervention is in the process of creating more problems than it resolves. It is one thing to force Qaddafi to leave. It is another thing to spread chaos and destruction in Libya to this end and to prepare the ground for fundamentalist Islam. The current moves risk destabilizing all of North Africa, the Sahel, and the Middle East and favoring the emergence of a new regional base for radical Islam and terrorism.

What follows are some further translated highlights from the CIRET-CF2R report. The full report is available in French here.

 Libyan rebel leader proudly announces him and his men are al-Qaeda

On the Battle of Misrata:

Little by little, the city is starting to appear like a Libyan version of Sarajevo in the eyes of the “free” world. The rebels from Benghazi hope that a humanitarian crisis in Misrata will convince the Western coalition to deploy ground troops in order to save the population.
 . . . During the course of April, the NGO Human Rights Watch published casualty figures concerning Misrata that reveal that, contrary to the claims made in the international media, Qaddafi loyalist forces have not massacred the residents of the town. During two months of hostilities, only 257 persons — including combatants — were killed. Among the 949 wounded, only 22 — or fewer than 3 percent — were women. If regime forces had deliberately targeted civilians, women would have represented around half of the victims.
It is thus now obvious that Western leaders — first and foremost, President Obama — have grossly exaggerated the humanitarian risk in order to justify their military action in Libya.
The real interest of Misrata lies elsewhere. . . . The control of this port, at only 220 kilometers from Tripoli, would make it an ideal base for launching a land offensive against Qaddafi.

On Benghazi and the Cyrenaica Region:

Benghazi is well-known as a hot-bed of religious extremism. The Cyrenaica region has a long Islamist tradition going back to the Senussi brotherhood. Religious fundamentalism is much more evident here than in the western part of the country. Women are completely veiled from head to foot. They cannot drive and their social life is reduced to a minimum. Bearded men predominate. They often have the black mark of piety on their foreheads [the “zebibah,” which is formed by repeated prostration during Muslim prayers].

It is a little-known fact that Benghazi has become over the last 15 years the epicenter of African migration to Europe. This traffic in human beings has been transformed into a veritable industry, generating billions of dollars.

Parallel mafia structures have developed in the city, where the traffic is firmly implanted and employs thousands of people, while corrupting police and civil servants. It was only a year ago that the Libyan government, with the help of Italy, managed to bring this cancer under control.

Following the disappearance of its main source of revenue and the arrest of a number of its bosses, the local mafia took the lead in financing and supporting the Libyan rebellion. Numerous gangs and members of the city’s criminal underworld are known to have conducted punitive expeditions against African migrant workers in Benghazi and the surrounding area. Since the start of the rebellion, several hundred migrant workers — Sudanese, Somalis, Ethiopians, and Eritreans — have been robbed and murdered by rebel militias. This fact is carefully hidden by the international media.

On African “Mercenaries” and Tuaregs:

One of the greatest successes [of Qaddafi’s African policy] is his “alliance” with the Tuaregs [a traditionally nomadic population spread over the region of the Sahara], whom he actively financed and supported when their movement was repressed in Mali in the 1990s.
 . . . In 2005, Qaddafi accorded an unlimited residency permit to all Nigerian and Malian Tuaregs on Libyan territory. Then, in 2006, he called on all the tribes of the Sahara region, including Tuareg tribes, to form a common entity to oppose terrorism and drug trafficking . . . 
This is why hundreds of combatants came from Niger and Mali to help Qaddafi [after the outbreak of the rebellion]. In their view, they were indebted to Gaddafi and had an obligation to do so. . . . 
Many things have been written about the “mercenaries” serving in the Libyan security forces, but few of them are accurate. . . . 
In recent years, foreigners have been recruited [into the Libyan army]. The phenomenon is entirely comparable to the phenomenon that one observes on all levels of Libyan economic life. There is a very large population of foreign workers in search of employment in the country. The majority of the recruits originally come from Mali, Chad, Niger, Congo, and Sudan. . . . 
The information from rebel sources on supposed foreign intrusions [i.e. mercenaries] is vague and should be treated with caution. . . . 
On the other hand, it is a proven fact — and the mission was able to confirm this itself — that Tuaregs from Niger came to Tripoli to offer their support to Qaddafi.(video) They did so spontaneously and out of a sense of debt.
 . . . It seems that Libyans of foreign origin and genuine volunteers coming from foreign countries are being deliberately confused [in the reports on “mercenaries”]. Whatever the actual number [of foreign fighters], they form only a small part of the Libyan forces.

On the role of the international media:

Up until the end of February, the situation in western Libyan cities was extremely tense and there were clashes — more so than in the east. But the situation was the subject of exaggeration and outright disinformation in the media. For example, a report that Libyan aircraft bombed Tripoli is completely inaccurate: No Libyan bomb fell on the capital, even though bloody clashes seem to have taken place in certain neighborhoods. . . . (video)
The consequences of this disinformation are clear. The U.N. resolution [mandating intervention] was approved on the basis of such media reports.(see Al Jazerra Lies) No investigative commission was sent to the country. It is no exaggeration to say that sensationalist reporting by al-Jazeera influenced the U.N.

On the insurrection in Benghazi:

As soon as the protests started, Islamists and criminals immediately took advantage of the situation in order to attack high-security prisons outside Benghazi where their comrades were being held. Following the liberation of their leaders, the rebellion attacked police stations (video)and public buildings. The residents of the city woke up to see the corpses of policemen hanging from bridges.

Numerous atrocities were likewise committed against African workers (video), who have all been treated as “mercenaries.” African workers were expelled, murdered, imprisoned, and tortured.(video)

On the insurrection in Zawiya (a town in western Libya):

During the three weeks [that the town was controlled by the rebels], all public buildings were pillaged and set on fire. . . . Everywhere, there was destruction and pillaging (of arms, money, archives). There was no trace of combat, which confirms the testimony of the police [who claim to have received orders not to intervene]. . . . 

There were also atrocities committed (women who were raped, and some police officers who were killed), as well as civilian victims during these three weeks. . . . The victims were killed in the manner of the Algerian GIA [Armed Islamic Group]: throats cut, eyes gauged out, arms and legs cut off, sometimes the bodies were burned . . .You can see video

— John Rosenthal writes on European politics and transatlantic security issues. You can follow his work at www.trans-int.com or on Facebook.

see also : WHO IS "OPPOSITION" in Libya  (part I) -> http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/06/who-is-oppostion-in-libya-part-i.html

(V) ALERT!!! Invasion of Libya in July 2011!

by  ALEX JONES

   Informational website Infowars.com, owned the famous American TV presenter Alex Jones received disturbing reports from military personnel on the basis of Ft. Hood in Texas, confirming the presence of U.S. plans to begin full-scale ground operation in Libya. Presumably the invasion to begin in October this year, after the deployment of troops in the region.

    The source said that more special forces will go to Libya in July, and the first division Calvary (heavy machinery) and the 3rd Corps rapid deployment of land in late October - early November. Initial troop level is estimated at 12 thousand soldiers and 15 thousand employees of logistics, that is, a total of nearly 30 thousand troops.

    This information is confirmed by numerous phone calls and emails from other soldiers, some of whom argue that the troop deployment will begin in September. According to these sources the operation will be supported by the British SAS. Also, there is evidence that the U.S. military assault of sabotage and reconnaissance units are already in Libya. Messages vary in detail, but in general the overall picture is pretty clear: as Qaddafi continues to shy away from trying to remove him from power, the fall will be a full-scale war.

    A informant, identified in reports as a "specialist H" morgue worker at U.S. Central Command, said that Americans already have a loss in Libya. He said that at least two soldiers and three civilians were killed by gunshot wounds, as reported by the media yet.

    The fact that Libya is preparing a full-scale war, the fifth, in addition to four already ongoing at the same time in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen, "Alex Canal" also told the geo-political analyst Webster Tarpley doctor. The desire to spin as much as possible the spread of regional conflicts could well trigger World War III, which will also cover Syria, Lebanon, Iran and even Saudi Arabia, said Tarpley.

    Meanwhile, Obama refuses to report to Congress regarding the continuation of hostilities after the allowed 60-day period, "the president of law." First he promised to finish all in a matter of days, and now calls the events "Kinetic" and not war. In this case it is justified by the fact that is subject to a UN mandate.

    And on Saturday, June 18, it became known that Obama has decided to continue military operations in Libya, even if he fails to get Congressional approval, and despite the fact that the Pentagon lawyers and advisers were opposed to this plan.

by Jazira Chuibekova on Saturday, 18 June 2011 at 14:09